I want to support comedians unconditionally.

 I believe that one of the essential elements of finding joy in work is


"bringing happiness to others"—


in other words, altruism. It recently occurred to me that comedians are the people who experience this most viscerally.


Making people laugh is an incredibly difficult feat, isn't it? If your timing is off by even a fraction, you "bomb." It is something I could never do myself.


When it *does* work, people laugh—and when people are laughing, they are unconditionally happy. They momentarily forget any unpleasantness or hardships they’ve been through. That sense of happiness felt by the audience reflects directly back onto the person who made them laugh, filling the performer with a profound sense of bliss. I found myself thinking that this feeling is likely the driving force behind their choice to work as comedians.


That is why I want to offer my unconditional support to comedians, *rakugo* storytellers, and everyone else whose work involves making us laugh.


Guided by love and compassion


←　→

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bodhisattva Never Disparaging

 "All will be saved." I've even gone so far as to think that this is the same as what Bodhisattva Never Disparaging, who appears in the Lotus Sutra, already proclaimed: "I do not despise you. You will all become Buddhas." Isn't it the same thing when I say "All will be saved" and when Bodhisattva Never Disparaging says "All will become Buddhas"? So what I'm doing is just copying Bodhisattva Never Disparaging. It's an honor. This bodhisattva was always spreading the word, "I do not despise you. You will all become Buddhas," so everyone found him annoying, and he ended up being persecuted by people throwing stones at him and hitting him with sticks. So what did this bodhisattva do? "He ran away to avoid them and shouted from afar, 'I do not despise you. You will all become Buddhas!'" Not cool. Instead of facing them with dignity, he cowardly runs away, turning his back on the enemy and howling from afar l...
Read more

Two Theorems of Religion

 To summarize all the scriptures, I believe they can be summed up in two theorems: 1. God (Buddha) loves all of us. 2. The God (Buddha) who loves us all is the only one who is omniscient and omnipotent. First, if God (Buddha) does not love us, then we are finished. We would be hopeless. No matter how omniscient and omnipotent God may be, if He does not love us, He has no meaning to us. It is precisely because He loves us that He has meaning to us. Next, second, no matter how much God loves us, if He is not omniscient and omnipotent, then He is meaningless. If God is not omniscient and omnipotent, then we can imagine situations where "even God cannot save this person." And the exception clause "this person is impossible" is always over-interpreted, weakening God's love, leading to "this person, this person, too, cannot be saved," and ultimately to "no one can be saved." "This person is the only one He can't save." When we say thi...
Read more

What can be derived from the two theorems of religion?

 I've gone through Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, and Ramakrishna (Hinduism?), reading each of their sacred texts. But for some reason, God (Buddha) sealed them away, and I haven't been able to open them for the past 15 or 20 years. They're still on the bookshelf on the left, though. Naturally, I gradually forgot the words of the scriptures, and only two things remained. 1. God(Buddha) loves us. 2. God (Buddha) is  the only one who is omniscient and omnipotent  . And from these two theorems, we can deduce: "All people will be saved." Perhaps we should call people sentient beings. In other words, all life. It's a natural conclusion. It's as self-evident as saying that 1 + 1 = 2. If we are loved by God (Buddha) and that God (Buddha) is omnipotent and omniscient, then of course we will be saved. That's what I'm here to say, but I'm not the first person to say it. Shinran said it, Nichiren reluctantly acknowledged it, Origen also said it in Christi...
Read more